Author Topic: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit  (Read 6316 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pete-zza

  • Lifetime Member
  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 19393
  • Location: Texas
  • Always learning
King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« on: May 08, 2009, 06:38:32 PM »
The following article on a lawsuit brought by King Arthur against Trader Joe's appeared recently at Bakingbusiness.com:

King Arthur sues Trader Joe's for infringement

(Bakingbusiness.com, May 08, 2009)
by Eric Schroeder

PITTSBURGH — Norwich, Vt.-based King Arthur Flour Company, Inc. (KAF) has accused Monrovia, Calif.-based grocery chain Trader Joe’s Co. of trademark infringement in a federal lawsuit filed May 6 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

As part of the lawsuit, King Arthur Flour has accused Trader Joe’s of "wrongful sale of flour products under the name ‘Baker’s Pantry’ in packaging that infringes the distinctive trade dress of KAF products, and defendant’s passing off of flour as that of KAF."

In its filing, King Arthur Flour said Trader Joe’s had sold the company’s products for nearly a decade beginning in 1998, and in the last year in which it purchased goods from King Arthur Flour had bought more than $3 million worth of flour products from King Arthur Flour. But in January 2008, King Arthur Flour said it was approached by Trader Joe’s to develop a private label flour, an opportunity that King Arthur Flour refused because it does not produce private label products.

According to the lawsuit, Trader Joe’s stopped buying flour from King Arthur Flour in February 2009 and began selling private label white whole wheat flour and all-purpose flour under the Baker’s Pantry house brand in packaging similar to King Arthur Flour.

"There was no other brand of flour sold by Trader Joe’s after it stopped selling KAF brand flour except the confusingly similar ‘Baker’s Pantry’ flour," the lawsuit claims. "Trader Joe’s packaging for ‘Baker’s Pantry’ copied the color of the KAF packaging, copied the ‘head’ and ‘foot’ bands of color interspersed with a white band that begins less than an inch from the foot of the flour bag.

"In addition to intentionally copying and trying to evoke the color of KAF packaging, Trader Joe’s sells its flour under the name or mark ‘Baker’s Pantry’ in a clear attempt to evoke the KAF’s family of famous ‘Baker’s" trademarks (i.e., ‘Baker’s Catalogue,’ ‘The Baker’s Store’ and ‘Baker’s Companion’).

"Trader Joe’s packaging also evokes KAF branding by its use of lions (to indicate royalty), a form of banner evocative of the medieval times of the legendary King Arthur. This type of medieval banner is widely used by KAF at trade shows and the like and associated with KAF’s flour products."

The lawsuit also alleges that Trader Joe’s employees across the country are regularly advising customers that the Trader Joe’s flour is the same flour as that produced by King Arthur Flour, and that King Arthur Flour is in fact supplying Trader Joe’s under a private label agreement.

King Arthur Flour is seeking a temporary restraining order, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. In addition, the company is seeking compensatory relief in the form of lost profits and an accounting of Trader Joe’s profits resulting from the trademark infringement.


Peter

Offline Essen1

  • Supporting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3237
  • Location: SF Bay Area
    • The Hobby Cook
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2009, 07:13:33 PM »
Now I know why, all of a sudden, I couldn't find any KAF at any TJ's here in SF.

But what the lawsuit says, in regards to the packaging, is true. They look extremely similar.
Mike

"Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new."  - Albert Einstein

http://www.thehobbycook.com

Offline Pete-zza

  • Lifetime Member
  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 19393
  • Location: Texas
  • Always learning
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2009, 07:16:54 PM »
From this recent post, http://www.pizzamaking.com/forum/index.php/topic,8492.0.html, it looks like the TJ replacement flour leave much to be desired.

Peter

Offline Keith_Doughboy

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 8
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2009, 08:38:07 PM »
I say good job KAF! If you spend the years that they've spent developing and maintaining such a quality product, then you deserve the exclusivity of your brand.

TJ's got greedy. Instead of using the KAF product visibilty in a good way, they decided to take the low road of greed. They did a disservice to their customers, and I'm also sure that other vendors are going to look at them differently. Has there been a change in command at TJ's in the recent past that would prompt them to try and pull something like this? These are not good economic times to be playing 'my attorney can beat up yours', especially since I doubt theirs can...  :-D

The plain and simple truth is, a good many customers who normally wouldn't go out of their way to a TJ's were going there specifically to get their KAF. A customer in the store that you did not have to pay advertising dollars for is GOLDEN. What fools. I'm speechless...  ???

Offline Essen1

  • Supporting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3237
  • Location: SF Bay Area
    • The Hobby Cook
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2009, 08:53:46 PM »
From this recent post, http://www.pizzamaking.com/forum/index.php/topic,8492.0.html, it looks like the TJ replacement flour leave much to be desired.

Peter


I haven't tried TJ's flour, but I don't think it's anywhere close to the trusted KA brand. I think they shot themselves in the foot when they decided not to stock the flour any longer. Damn Germans!  ;D
Mike

"Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new."  - Albert Einstein

http://www.thehobbycook.com

Offline abatardi

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 433
  • Age: 52
  • Location: Santa Clara, CA
  • It's MOOPS!
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2009, 02:13:54 AM »
Anyone have a pic of the TJ "Baker's Pantry" flour bags?
Make me a bicycle CLOWN!

Offline djones148

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 39
  • Location: Orange County, CA
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2009, 03:02:23 AM »

Offline perna

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 22
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2009, 03:34:45 AM »
Seems like this is mostly a revenge lawsuit by KA, due to them losing a 3 million dollar a year customer.

The bags might look similar, but since Trader joes uses red for the name on thier store and the buliding are off white, using those colors is reasonable. KA claiming the rights to using "baker's" anthing is pretty rediculous when it is on a baking product, next they will be going after sam's club for selling "bakers and chefs" items and selling flour in a red and white bag.

It seems that KA thought they had the market cornered on flour, and that trader joes couldnt find someone else to make flour for them. Considering the amount of time they did business together KA should have thought about making a private label for them. The best KA can expect from this is that the label is changed and they make a bit of money from sueing. When they could have just put the flour in thier bags and continued to sell them 3 million worth of flour a year.

Offline November

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 1836
  • Location: North America
  • I just need one more electron.
    • Food Sim
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2009, 09:16:14 AM »
My first reaction when looking at Trader Joe's flour bag was, "That looks like a very different brand of flour."  So here's the problem: anyone familiar with King Arthur's bags could spot that bag as being a different brand from an isle away, and anyone not familiar with King Arthur's bags wouldn't suspect it's a King Arthur brand because they wouldn't know what to look for.  The real test to this case is if the bag can be proven that it directs the consumer to believe it is King Arthur brand flour.  I don't think there's enough there.  The color itself certainly isn't enough as store brands often copy the best-selling brand's color scheme.  I've seen it done at Publix before.  If King Arthur can prove it, the most damaging evidence would be employees telling customers that it's a King Arthur private label flour.  There's where Trader Joe's will lose the case for sure.

Offline David

  • Supporting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 967
  • What’s So Funny ‘Bout Pizza Love and Understanding
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2009, 11:55:28 AM »
The TJ bag does look like a cheap knock off.I'm familiar with KA products though,so my opinion is biased.The use of "From the Land Of " by TJ's immediately brings me to think of KA the Knight and I also associate that with the flour.The rampant lion gives it a heraldic tone and the yellow banner took me mentally straight to Mozza ( who probably ripped it off from some obscure Italian Tuna can or the like !).The obvious typeface / colour similarity is blatant plagiarism IMO.
I think that the packaging design dept. at Trader Joes needs an overhaul.Second rate and second best.
This could be a fun "Monthly challenge" Bill? Rip off anyone you like and come up with a better flour bag design.
regards,
David
If you're looking for a date... go to the Supermarket.If you're looking for a wife....go to the Farmers market

Offline Chef_Boy-R-Dee

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 183
  • Location: Mid-Atlantic
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2009, 03:17:39 PM »
So if I make a flour in a red and white bag, have a medieval theme to it (Richard the Lionhearted bread flour, Catherine of Aragon's Italian style flour, Joan of Arc all purpose) ...then I will be sued?

How is saying "from the land of" trademark infringment? It brings me to think of "middle earth".
"Simplicity is Complexity Resolved"

-Constantin Brancusi

Offline scaredycat

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 1
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2009, 12:13:39 PM »
<< The lawsuit also alleges that Trader Joe’s employees across the country are regularly advising customers that the Trader Joe’s flour is the same flour as that produced by King Arthur Flour, and that King Arthur Flour is in fact supplying Trader Joe’s under a private label agreement.>>


Trader Joe's is a very secretive company and employees aren't told who makes Trader Joe's private label products. Even store managers don't know for sure.

Store employees who tell customers that the new flour brand is made by King Arthur are just assuming that's the case. The company rebrands other companies' brands whenever they can so usually its a safe bet. In this case the King Arthur website spilled the beans and the news of the lawsuit let the cat out of the bag!





Offline Pete-zza

  • Lifetime Member
  • Global Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 19393
  • Location: Texas
  • Always learning
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2009, 06:49:42 PM »
Here is an update on this matter:

King Arthur flour lawsuit with Trader Joe's dismissed

(Bakingbusiness.com, May 19, 2009)
by Bakingbusiness Staff

PITTSBURGH — The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed earlier this month by Norwich, Vt.-based King Arthur Flour Company, Inc. (KAF) against Monrovia, Calif.-based grocery chain Trader Joe’s Co. The dismissal follows the two parties reaching an amicable resolution to the dispute, with each agreeing to bear their own court costs.

King Arthur Flour had alleged trademark infringement against Trader Joe’s in a federal lawsuit filed May 6 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. As part of the lawsuit, KAF accused Trader Joe’s of "wrongful sale of flour products under the name ‘Baker’s Pantry’ in packaging that infringes the distinctive trade dress of KAF products, and defendant’s passing off of flour as that of KAF." In addition, KAF called for a temporary restraining order on Trader Joe’s ability to market the flour.

In its defense, Trader Joe’s in a May 8 filing called the lawsuit "meritless."

"KAF cannot establish a likelihood of success on the merits because even the ‘evidence’ submitted by KAF shows that Trader Joe’s has done nothing wrong," Trader Joe’s noted. "KAF makes numerous unsupported factual claims that its own evidence and a few Internet queries reveal to be entirely false. A temporary restraining order is an extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly and only in clear cases."


Peter

Offline just cheese please

  • Registered User
  • Posts: 1
Re: King Arthur/Trader Joe's Lawsuit
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2011, 08:56:04 PM »
I was so disappointed when KAF was discontinued from my neighborhood TJ's. It was always the hunt to find the best price at local grocers who normally charge in excess of $5 a bag.  Thrilled the local Target expanded it's grocery inventory and sells KAF AP & Bread formulations for $3.99!!!


 



pizzapan