Why do the protected have to protect themselves from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to take a protection that didn't protect the protected in the first place?
I don't advocate for the protected protecting themselves from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to take protection.
I am opposed to mandatory vaccination.
Personally, I've overcome my nervousness and had the jab.
But I still worry about taking a vaccine that hasn't been around all that long.
It remains to be seen whether there is a long term health effect no-one has predicted.
But, I made my choice, and the anti-vaxxers have made theirs.
Darwinism will run its course. At some point in the future, it will become apparent who was right.
Eventually whoever made the wrong choice will be weeded out and our ambulance drivers, doctors and nurses will get a well earned break.
I'd be interested on how you arrive at the idea the vaccines "didn't protect the protected in the first place".
But start a new thread, we've hijacked Walter's thread long enough.